Skip to main content

How do you know you're right?

So I'm only on the 2nd class of the year in my Grade 10 Math course so far.  We start late, and we only see them for 3 hours a week, so yes, we move a little slow.
I had set them some review problems in Grade 9 Math, mostly questions of simple algebra, linear equations, graphs of lines, etc.  And had them work on the questions about as freely as I could -- but since they're new, they didn't express much freedom. They didn't talk much, they certainly didn't talk to each other, and they didn't check their work with each other. This will change.  I had deliberately told them that I did not put the answers at the bottom of the OneNote page and that they would have to check their work somehow.
Ten minutes in, I did a screen capture of a student's work from their OneNote Section and pasted it into my OneNote page for the day and asked them "How does the student know they're correct?"
The obvious answers came up:
  • Do it again
  • Check with another student
  • Ask me
And then one student said they would google the answer.  Great!  So we googled
This was going to waste a lot of time ... none of these were our questions and we're only asking for "is the answer correct?"
Another student brought up Khan Academy, so we tried that.
Typing in the question 2x-3y+5 when x = -2 and y = 3 into the search box gave us nothing.  A student said we should just type in "simplifying expressions" (which was interesting because the question said evaluate).  But we tried that.

This led us to a 4 minute video on distributing to simplify expressions. A helpful video on a topic which only tangentially applies here.  Not very efficient.
So we then talked about other possible technological aids, and across three classes, we brought up the following:
1) WolframAlpha - http://www.wolframalpha.com
W/A was quick; it gave us the answer we expected. Now, if we wanted to pay we could get the step by step solution, but if the question is, "is the answer correct?" we're good to go.

2) Desmos - http://www.desmos.com
This one surprised me... of course, it's going to do the calculation. The interesting question will be when we move into quadratics and algebraic manipulations and how Desmos & the students will adapt to the different requirements of evaluating correctness.


3) Photomath - https://photomath.net/en/
When one student brought up Photomath, another student tried to shush him -- like it was some secret that math teachers aren't supposed to know. But yes, Photomath will show whether or not the answer is correct. It's free and it does show the steps.  It wouldn't do the substitution but once that was done, it would evaluate just fine.

4) GraspableMath - http://www.graspablemath.com
I brought this one to them in anticipation of our foray into linear systems. It doesn't actually check the answer but it does verify that they're doing their steps correctly, which I kinda like more.  It's not the "here's a maybe helpful similar question" that Khan Academy might give you; it's the actual question bounded by the rules of arithmetic & algebra.  If the students have attempted something outside the "rules", then GraspableMath isn't going to let them replicate those steps.

I *do* wish that it had #digitalink input so that they could use their pens rather than have to labouriously type out the equation; I hope that's down the road.
I really appreciated Lauren Nelson's (@LENelson49)'s question on Twitter:
I think that
(1) letting them know I know these tools exist ("shhh... don't let Mr. A know about Photomath!") is important. As a general rule, I don't put marks in my mark calculation that come from work done outside of my view -- it's why I use OneNote, Vertical/Horizontal non-permanent surfaces and other observations & conversations so much.  I have data of them doing math in front me that I don't rely on homework, worksheets, etc that their parents, their tutors, their apps may be doing for them.
(2) showing them how I use these tools to verify I have correct answer (or solution) validates their existence beyond the "cheating". Professionals use these tools to verify their work; students should get used to always checking their work using any convenient tool -- the greatest authors had to go through an editor.
(3) normalize the fact that they may need support when they are alone - they can't always ask anybody and they don't need to spend the time searching for a perhaps only tangentially helpful video from KhanAcademy/YouTube when they only need to confirm their correctness.
(4) encourage them to use these tools to explore -- what happens when we use higher powers? How complicated can we make the expressions before we break the program (Photomath will tell you it can't solve that question yet)?  What do all the other things that WolframAlpha brings up mean? W/A will bring up any mathematics related to your question, so when we moved into quadratics, graphs, imaginary values and calculus come up quite often.
This was a really simple question to verify the answer to, but by doing it with something really simple, it helps move them into situations where the expressions & equations are more complicated. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Desmos, OneNote & Replay

So using Desmos activities are a great way to encourage exploration and discussion in math class -- if you haven't tried them, I encourage it.  They're collected at  https://teacher.desmos.com/  But ... Desmos doesn't give you quite enough.  It doesn't have a way of capturing the work that the student does within their space, and it doesn't allow for annotation of class contributions as we come together to discuss.  Well, not surprisingly, OneNote comes to the rescue.  Using the Windows shortcut Windows-Shift-S it is really quick to snag the Desmos screen and pop it into a waiting OneNote page.  From there, we can grab our pen and (using wireless projection) talk about what all the different responses mean and where to go from there. (An aside : one of the nice features of Desmos activities are the way you can hit PAUSE and it will pause all the screens of the students working.  I always give them a heads up "10 seconds to pause..." and it's refr

So you want to hack your OneNote Class Notebook

Taking a brief break from my "Getting Started with OneNote Class Notebook" series (you can start that one here )... This is a little advanced so if you're not comfortable setting permissions inside of Office365 you may want to avoid this.  Or set up a Class Notebook to play with so that it doesn't affect any existing Class Notebooks.  Yeah, the latter is a good option. One of the great powers of OneNote is that you can do some really neat permissioning of the Section Tabs. When the Notebook is created, of course, it gives you an "open permissions" on the Collaboration Space and student-read-only on the Content Library.  And then each student space is wide open to each individual student. But we've found that occasionally you want to mix up the permissions a little.  For example, you could create a space in a student section for your private notes that the student couldn't see, or maybe you want a tab in the Collaboration Space that students cou

Escape Room / BreakOut in OneNote

[[Part 2 of this article is here: Link] ] So when I was visiting  Anna in Edinburgh  during March Break, she showed me how she used Password-Protected OneNote sections within the OneNote ClassNotebook to help students check their work -- she set the password to the correct answer, so they knew they had it right when the Section opened up. I figured I could use this for Math Review, so I set aside a couple of hours (turned out to be 3 hours but a fair chunk of that was solution-time) the other night to put an Exam Review together for my Grade 10 Mathematics course.  I pulled together as many multiple choice questions and short answer questions on the topics as I could Google and tried to balance each Section with a mix of topics and then threw in a couple of pop-culture questions, too.  The students worked on the problems in each section and used the answers as passwords to unlock the next section until they got to the Prize section. Result?  Near total continual engagement