data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cbeb/8cbeb3fd6afc5e978b54dd04a05dbea170fad036" alt=""
It can't be hard to do; I've done it. NCTM in 04, MAA in 05. I didn't do it at the OAME last year because the room was so small and crowded with people there was no camera angle ... but then I also posted everything on my conference wiki (which is a whole other issue).
Now, people will say ... what about the cost? Why pay for going to the conference when I can just watch it online? Well... there's a big difference between being there and watching it live or even later. Face-to-face gives us so many opportunities that video just doesn't -- I'd much rather attend in person. But what about using a micro-payment model for the video archives? Heck, even a tip-jar. For live-streams, why not a video-attendee rate?
This issue has always been on the back burner for me (ask the poor administrator of the math-ed group mailing list) but Educon 2.1 really made it clear for me. If I'm going to a conference physically, I want to make sure that people who aren't as lucky as I am can get in on it, too!
Comments
Just back from the Will Richardson conference this weekend. As I tweeted, can't argue.
But here's the thing; we had issues with bandwidth, connecticity, Will R. set up a U-Stream on Day 2, we had duplicated chats and wikis. Was it poorly organized? In what way? Venue technicians?
I agree that we should be there, but how do you get there from here?
That seems to be my framing question.
The video archive would be helpful... how many times have we returned to our schools and wished we could share our experiences with our colleagues. Our notes seem so deficient.